Research-backed design

MyReply was inspired by research that reveals why most self-help legal tools fail. And we have learned how to build self-help tools that work.

Our Approach

1. Legal self-help is already accessible — but it isn’t deployable

Legal aid providers, bar associations and courts have spent decades solving the wrong half of the problem: legal information and court forms are widely available, but availability isn't the same as usability. Research shows that even when people have the right materials in front of them, they are still unable to take the necessary steps to help themselves with their legal issues.

Legal guides designed for self-represented parties have to be usable under real-world conditions. People navigating the legal system without a lawyer are derailed by stress, anxiety, and unfamiliarity with the legal process. We designed MyReply to meet renters where they are, and we focus on helping people take action in their case.

2. Legal problems are mostly human problems

The obstacles people face in dealing with legal problems have little to do with legal knowledge. Instead, they are psychological and practical challenges, like cognitive overload, fear, shame, not knowing where to sit or when to speak. These kinds of challenges are studied in fields other than law, including psychology, public health, and education. Our tools draw on evidence from those fields to eliminate barriers to usability, instead of assuming that using “plain language” is enough.

3. Good design is tested, not assumed

Materials that seem clear to lawyers often fail with the people who need them. The only way to know if they work is to test with real users and iterate on the design. We treat every tool as a hypothesis to be validated in the field, not as a final product.

MyReply helps renters navigate evictions